💎 McDonald’s, Crypto, & Squid Game (19 June 2022)

mainIMG

Sometimes, we need to go through the bad times so as to fix them and bounce back stronger.

This week, we talk about the ongoing setbacks and how businesses and investors are approaching them to figure out comebacks.


Burgers 2.0.png

Russians got their McDonald's back but with a changed name. Three months after McD decided to pull out of Russia, it sold its 850 restaurants to Alexander Govor, a Siberian businessman.

Now, 15 former McDonald’s restaurants in the Russian capital have reopened under a new name “Tasty and that’s it”. Through the rebranding, the intent is to comfort Russians that they can continue to live western lifestyles – even if Big Macs are gone from the menu.

And the others...

Some such as McDonald's and Starbucks have totally shut down their businesses in Russia. Others like IBM are trying an orderly wind-down in an orderly manner.

Then there are companies like Renault, the French car company that sold its Russian operation to a state-backed group for a lower than fair price but also secured an option to buy the business back in 6 years.

Drivers of sell-out decision

  • Preserve the overall global group's performance so that the financial burden of the costs of the halted Russian business does not hurt the investors

  • To make a responsible choice towards the employees of the business and get them secured jobs

  • Ukrainian authorities have also put pressure on certain Western brands, calling for a boycott until they pull out of Russia.

Our take

Back in March, many businesses took an abrupt call to exit Russia and later on thought about the consequences of doing so. Some of them are now choosing between shutting down completely or keeping the doors open for a possible return in the future.

If they permanently shut down, they need to find the right buyer who would pay them a fair price and also retain the employees. If they think of returning, they might have to scout for a trusted party who would help them get back once the political environment is appropriate. All about the right choices!


Crypto Winters.png

After more than one year of the rising streak, the crypto winters are back. Last time we saw a bear market in crypto was from Jan'18 to Dec'20, when the value of crypto coins was on a falling spree.

Starting in 2021, with the adoption of crypto by many institutions like Tesla, retail investors also jumped in, kicking off a bull market. Consequently, many well-funded crypto startups came up, and also the share prices for the listed crypto players like Coinbase skyrocketed.

What's happening now?

The market value of the world’s 500 biggest crypto tokens dropped from $3.2 trillion in Nov'21 to less than $1 trillion last week.

Meanwhile, major crypto exchanges such as Coinbase and Gemini announced hiring freezes and layoffs in early June. Share prices of listed crypto players such as Coinbase have fallen 86% from their 52-week highs.

Why the winters?

  • As the recession looms, interest rates are rising and living costs are biting. We see the impact on the stock markets too, with global markets down by 20% and Indian markets by 10% since this year's record high

  • As a result, even the investors are less free with their money, and therefore have relatively less amount at our disposal to save and invest

  • Naturally, for most of us, investment in something as unpredictable and unregulated as cryptocurrency feels like a risk too great in these times

Our take

If winters continue for long, not many cryptocurrencies and crypto players might survive it. To invest in the space, besides keeping in mind the known unknown of the regulatory nod, one needs to do detailed due diligence. For selecting the right cryptocurrency, track the purpose of the coin, its technology, and how strong the community is.

For investing in crypto startups or listed crypto players, analysing the business model might help. Generally, the ones with more focus on institutions as clients might fare the difficult times better than the ones who are retail-centric.


Rescuing Netflix.png

Last week, Netflix announced the sequel season for its hit show, Squid Game. In 2021, about 142 million households watched it, making Squid Game the most-viewed new show in Netflix history. The Korean drama lured the local content preferring Asian subscribers, who until then were mostly served the Hollywood content.

Now, the launch of Squid Game 2 comes at a time when Netflix is reeling under subscriber loss. It reported a net loss of 200,000 subscribers globally, the first time ever since 2011. The bad news was it expects to lose another 2 million subscribers this quarter.

Rough times

Netflix lost 640,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada, 350,000 subscribers in Latin America, and 300,000 subscribers in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). The pioneer of TV on demand reported growth in only one region: Asia-Pacific, where paying subscribers grew by 1.1 million.

Hence the region could turn into a growth engine for the OTT platform if local series like Squid Game is focused more on.

How did the Squid game help Netflix last year?

  • The show boosted Netflix's market value by $19 billion within a month of its launch, way ahead of its streaming peers in the said time period

  • Netflix added 4.4 million subscribers in the quarter when the show was released, exceeding projections of 3.7 million

  • For Netflix, the entire season of Squid Game cost $21 million to produce – and the investment is now estimated to be worth $900 million

Our take

While local drama content like Squid game is a prime part of Netflix's strategy to tap into Asian markets, the platform also came up with series in more languages or launched more pocket-friendly mobile versions.

Asian markets will be different from others such as the US markets since pocket shares might be lower but the potential number of subscribers could be higher. It will be interesting to watch how Netflix gets it right here!